Back to our newsletter archive
Axandra
news archive: 4 December 2007
|
| Welcome
to the latest issue of the Search
Engine Facts newsletter.
This week, we're taking a look
at a recent statement of Google's
Matt Cutts about detecting websites
that use cloaking. Is your website
at risk?
In the news: Google experiments
with Digg-style voting on search
results, Google comments on
buying and selling links, Yahoo
releases the top trends in search
2007 and more.
Table of contents:
We hope that
you enjoy this newsletter
and that it helps you to get
more out of your website.
Please pass this newsletter
on to your friends.
Best regards,

|
| 1.
Google warns against cloaking:
we can detect it |
In
a recent blog post, Google's anti-spam
engineer Matt Cutts wrote about
cloaking. The blog post makes
several things clear:
- Google doesn't like cloaking.
- It doesn't matter if a small
or a big company uses cloaking.
- Websites that use cloaking
will be removed from Google's
index.
- Google will detect all cloaking
attempts sooner or later.
What is cloaking?
Cloaking is a search engine
optimization technique in
which the web page content
presented to search engine
spiders is different from
that presented to the normal
web surfers.
This is done by delivering
web page content based on
the IP address or the User-Agent
of the user requesting the
page.
When a user is identified
as a search engine spider,
a script on the server delivers
a different version of the
web page. The purpose of cloaking
is to deceive search engines.
All major search engines
consider cloaking to be a
violation of their guidelines.
For that reason, websites
that use cloaking will be
banned from the search results.
Google's opinion on "undetectable" cloaking
In his recent blog post,
Google's Matt Cutts commented
on a Danish company that offered
'undetectable' cloaking to
its customers.
Google tried to check if
this claim was true and they
quickly found a website that
used the services of the company.
It turned out that their cloaking
wasn't undetectable at all:
"If someone is trying
to manipulate Google by
deceptive cloaking, it means
that a webserver is returning
different content to Googlebot
than to users.
That’s a condition
that can be checked for
by algorithms or manually,
and such cloaking is certainly
not 'undetectable.'"
Don't risk your search
engine rankings
You might get short term
results with shady SEO techniques
such as cloaking but it is
very likely that your site
will be banned from search
engines if you use them. You'll
put your web business at severe
risk if you use black-hat
SEO methods.
If you want to get lasting
results, better use ethical search
engine optimization techniques.
It's not a good idea to trick
search engines. They will discover
this sooner or later. If you
want to know how to get high
search engine rankings without
offending search engines, take
a look at our free SEO
book.
|
| 2.
Search engine news of the week |
Google
experimenting with Digg style
voting on search results
"Google is experimenting
with Digg style voting features
on search results that allow
users to vote up or bury search
results they see. [...]
Google Labs notes that 'this
is an experimental feature
and may be available for only
a few weeks'".
Google
comments on buying and selling
links
"If, however, a webmaster
chooses to buy or sell links
for the purpose of manipulating
search engine rankings, we
reserve the right to protect
the quality of our index.
Buying or selling links that
pass PageRank violates our
webmaster guidelines."
Related: Google
bans ads for (most) paid
ad market places.
Top
trends in search in 2007
"Billions of search
queries from millions of users
have always provided a fascinating
window into the global cultural
climate. This year is no different,
but to keep things interesting,
we decided to take a slightly
different approach to looking
at search trends in 2007."
Search engine newslets
- Yahoo launches new
PDF ad service for publishers.
- Google introduces the AdWords Local PlusBox.
- Google versus the
telecoms.
- Ask UK now offers walking and
driving directions.
- Ask.com December Smart
Answers.
- Rumor: Google's Marissa
Mayer to demo Googlephone?
- PayPerPost users freaking
out over Google PageRank nuke.
- Yahoo tests "neighbors" for local search.
- Google expunges malware
sites from search results.
- Google helps kids to track Santa
Claus.
|
SEO
nonsense - sculpting PageRank
builds muscle
"I see that certain
voices are once again advocating
the idiocy of managing PageRank
through the use of rel='nofollow'
[...]
Do you recall that internal
PageRank is not reported by
Google? It’s not a number
between 1 and 10, according
to the technical literature
that is publicly accessible
on the Web. Where do you think
NoFollowers are getting their
PageRank information from?"
Who
clicks on ads? And what
might this mean?
"Companies increasingly
rely on ad revenue to turn
a profit and, while clicking
on ads may be declining, it
certainly hasn't gone away.
This raises a critical question:
Who are the people that click
on ads?"
Spammers
giving up? Google thinks so
"Google won't disclose
numbers, but the company says
that spam attempts, as a percentage
of e-mail that's transmitted
through its Gmail system,
have waned over the last year.
That could indicate that some
spammers have gotten discouraged
and have stopped trying to
get through Google’s
spam filters."
Back
to table of contents - Visit
Axandra.com
|
The Search Engine Facts newsletter is free. Please recommend it to someone you know.
You may publish one of the articles above on your Web site. However, you must not change the contents in any way. Also, you must keep all links and you must add the following two lines with a link to www.Axandra.com: "Copyright by Axandra.com. Web site promotion software."
All product names, copyrights and trademarks mentioned in this newsletter are owned by their respective trademark and copyright holders.
Back issues:
http://www.free-seo-news.com
Copyright © 2007 Axandra GmbH
Back to our newsletter archive 
|
|