Back to our newsletter archive
Axandra
news archive: 7 August
2007
|
| Welcome
to the latest issue of the Search
Engine Facts newsletter.
This week, we're taking a look
at a new method that Google
might use to filter annoying
pages from the search results.
In the news: A guaranteed way
to get a number one listing
on Google (with a catch), Google's
supplemental results go mainstream
and more.
Table of contents:
We hope that
you enjoy this newsletter
and that it helps you to get
more out of your website.
Please pass this newsletter
on to your friends.
Best regards,

|
| 1.
How Google might filter annoying
pages |
Google
recently filed a patent application
with the title "Detecting
and rejecting annoying documents".
Here's the abstract of the application:
"A system and method
for evaluating documents
for approval or rejection
and/or rating.
The method comprises
comparing the document to
one or more criteria determining
whether the document contains
an element that is substantially
identical to one or more
of a visual element, an
audio element or a textual
element that is determined
to be displeasing."
The document describes how
Google might analyze text and
audio files. For example, Google
might use optical character
recognition tools and pattern
matching against image and sound
databases.
Why did Google do this?
Google probably wants to
make their ad reviewing process
faster. Their AdWords system
accepts images ads, video
ads and text ads.
Google has ad design guidelines and
Google has to review all of
these ads before they can
be displayed in the AdWords
network.
Manually reviewing these
ads would take a lot of time.
Given the high number of ads
that Google displays, it might
be impossible to review them
all.
What are they looking
for? Does this affect normal
website rankings?
Google wants to avoid that
ads are annoying or offensive.
For example, they check if
an ad is flashing, has repetitive
movement or infinite loops.
The use of streaming video
and audio is also checked
as well as the quality of
the images.
Google also checks the content
of the ads (offensive language,
adult content) and many associated
factors.
While it seems that these
methods are currently used
for ads the same criteria
can also apply to normal web
pages. If an ad annoys its
viewers then it's likely that
a web page with the same elements
will annoy its visitors. For
that reason, Google might
also use these quality checks
for the normal search results.
What does this mean
to your website?
If your website contains many
flashy elements, you might want
to redesign it. Professional
website design might be an important
factor for high search engine
rankings in the near future.
While professional design is
important, it is also important
that search engines can parse
the content of your web pages.
Use IBP's search
engine spider simulator to
check if search engines can
read your web pages.
|
| 2.
Search engine news of the week |
A
guaranteed number one listing
at Google!
"I was researching some
stuff at Google UK and noticed
a new little feature at the
bottom of the page on many
of the searches I did.
Yes, you get to input the
URL of a favourite page on
the query subject, click the
button and, of course, you're
taken to your Google account
to log in to your personalized
search.
Next time you search for
digital cameras, your favourite
page is up top with a little
marker."
Editor's
note: This only works for
your personal searches. If
you want to get a top 10 listing
in the results that every
Google searcher sees then better
try this method.
[Google]
Supplemental goes mainstream
"Since 2006, we've completely
overhauled the system that
crawls and indexes supplemental
results. The current system
provides deeper and more continuous
indexing. Additionally, we
are indexing URLs with more
parameters and are continuing
to place fewer restrictions
on the sites we crawl. As
a result, Supplemental Results
are fresher and more comprehensive
than ever."
Editor's
note: This probably means
that web pages with many parameters
are more likely to appear
in the supplemental results.
Yahoo!
Buzzlist versus Google Trends
"This post takes a look
at how the two biggest internet
players, Yahoo! and Google,
approach delivering content
and services around a specific
area: search trend data. [...]
Yahoo! Buzz and Google Trends
are yin and yang; despite
all its nifty graphing and
plotting, Google Trends lacks
an interesting editorial hook
that the Buzz Index delivers
in spades."
Search engine newslets
- Yahoo adds search suggestions to
its toolbar.
- Google is looking for business
referral representatives.
- Take a look at the Google
cheat sheet.
- Search engine Accoona files
for IPO.
- TechPro’s CEO speaks
about Google
Maps bulk upload abuse.
- Answers.com seeing lower traffic.
- MSN now offers the Space
World project.
- Google releases AdWords
Editor 4.0.
- Privacy problems: Google
tells hacked Gmail users to wait it
out.
|
Wikia
- Jimbo takes on Google
"One of the most striking
research points during my
prep for the article was how
dependent Wikipedia (a separate
entity from Wikia) is on Google
traffic for its growth. [...]
Given the number of Wikipedia
entries in Google results,
I wonder just how dependent
Google is on Wikipedia for
content."
Can
Zwinky save Ask?
"Analysts haven’t
expected much from IAC’s
money-losing Internet media
and advertising unit, which
includes the Ask.com search
engine and Citysearch.com."
It’s
an ad world
"It is only a matter
of time until nearly all advertisements
around the world are digital.
[...]
How do we see Google, Yahoo
and Microsoft? It’s
important to see that our
industry is changing and the
borders are blurring, so it’s
clear the three of those companies
will have a huge share of
revenues which will come from
advertising"
Back to table
of contents - Visit
Axandra.com
|
"The
results are remarkable"
I
am a UK one-man business
(copywriter) in an overcrowded
market. Have been using IBP
and ARELIS since I set
up my site proper in January
2007 (now upgraded to Professional
version).
Results?
Remarkable - the site alone
is generating a very healthy
living. Will shortly be
able to drop Google and
Yahoo AdWords".
Len
Smith, www.copywriting-on-demand.com
Get your site mentioned in front of 130,000+ subscribers
We want to hear from you
about your successes with
IBP or ARELIS. Just write
us 2-3 sentences and you
might get featured in this
newsletter along with your
web site address.
Back to table
of contents - Visit
Axandra.com
|
The Search Engine Facts newsletter is free. Please recommend it to someone you know.
You may publish one of the articles above on your Web site. However, you must not change the contents in any way. Also, you must keep all links and you must add the following two lines with a link to www.Axandra.com: "Copyright by Axandra.com. Web site promotion software."
All product names, copyrights and trademarks mentioned in this newsletter are owned by their respective trademark and copyright holders.
Back issues:
http://www.free-seo-news.com
Copyright © 2007 Axandra GmbH
Back to our newsletter archive 
|